Jordan Peterson vs. Sam Harris debate analysis

in Philosophy by

Both Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris are liars working for (((a medium-size group of Jews))). However, Peterson actually insinuates some things that point toward actual truth. Thus, Peterson messes up his own lies.

Jordan Peterson clearly argues that morality must be grounded in the Higher Principles innate in european-whites completely independent of facts. Higher principles like freedom, the supremacy of the individual over the collective, order, commitment, and the family unit. Thus, Peterson argues that morality is not subjective.

Sam Harris argues that morality must be grounded in “facts”. However, the entire state of affairs of the world is comprised of an infinite number of facts, past, present, and future, which are open to an infinite number of interpretations. Therefore, Harris is actually arguing that morality is subjective.

Thus, Sam Harris is a Globalist Communist Jew spouting fallacies in an attempt to facilitate Jew takeover of the world. Harris attempts to adjust the definition of morality to something complete undefined so that non-whites are not criticized for their inability to be moral by following the Higher Principles innate in european-whites. non-whites are almost all genetically of too low IQ to even understand or follow the Higher Principles innate in european-whites.

If non-whites are allowed to proliferate to a higher percentage of America, America will no longer understand or follow the Higher Principles innate in european-whites and will no longer be America. It would become be a shit hole run by gangs and a police state, freedom would be lost forever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*